Pages

16 June, 2013

How to Read a Book


Let's see.

I used to think I had no clue, and yet, as I trawl the internet for the 'right' way, I realise no one else does, either. In fact, most people have even less of a clue than I do.

At least, after years and years of reading, I've figured out how to pick books I might want to read, and then actually get down to reading them. I don't need a blog somewhere on the shores of the vast ocean that is the web telling me to find a nice, quiet place. I can read pretty much anywhere, but certain times and weathers inspire me more than others. Like late at night, with nothing else to do, or during the rains, when the weather is special and amazing and cool. I know what kind of books I can read(well-written ones) and which ones I shouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole.(It's taken me precious reading time and money to identify those, anyway)

But the real question is, how does one get the most out of a really good book? I rarely ever think about what I'm reading while I'm reading it, and I'm sure this isn't correct. One should, in theory, immerse oneself, and yet be able to talk about it later.

Right?

I tried to read Tolstoy, experimentally, while thinking about and appreciating word usage, characterization and the like. And found myself here, in the present, instead of turn-of-the-century Russia, going to war against Napoleon Bonaparte. More importantly, Andrushka, my longtime fictional crush, stopped being a real person and became just another character fleshed out on paper. I felt like crying.

*sniff*

I give up. Now, unless someone makes me read a book in that way again, I never will. It shatters the soul, really. And ruins all the books that made my life worth living.

Then, I tried to read The Lord of the Flies while thinking about what was happening every chapter or so. I was safe from disconnection, since I thought about everyone, Piggy and Ralph and Jack, as real people, stuck on an island somewhere. But here, while I loathed Piggy initially, I started becoming as scared of the other boys as he was, eventually. And what happened in the end created an emotion in me, a deep root of self-hatred for a race that could become like this in practically no time at all, with no self-control and no ultimate feeling of responsibility when they are away from the eyes of civilization. And that terrified me, too.

So I stick, for the time being, to reading books like I always have, dissolving into nothingness for a while, and coming back with only the vague impression that I have witnessed, not been a part of, something great.

It's safer that way.

Katze

3 comments:

  1. one could always close one's eyes and 'hope' that the fearful thing passes away OR one could keep them open and look your fears in the eye and understand them.
    giving a piece in literature the 'analytical reading' may not be the best way to read in the sense that there need not be a "best" way of reading.
    it is only what the author intended (consciously or not is debatable) to give the experience of being in the place of the characters. so in a way 'experiencing' the narrative is IMHO not something you ought to doubt so much.
    also one mustn't lose touch with reality for long - however tempting that might seem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Fear is not about looking at anything in the eye, really. It's about that sinking sensation you get when you know something is behind you: whether it'll hurt you or not is another matter.
      While experiencing the book is as the author intends it to be read, it may not be the only way. My courses talk about the importance of analytical reading and I wanted to try it out. Hence the blog post.

      Delete
  2. I always wanted to read Lord of the Flies. I never did find a hard copy. I really should. God, I need to read this book!

    ReplyDelete